The
right of a woman to plan her family through birth control is one of the most
crucial ideas of this century. The viewpoints of Margaret Sanger’s The Case for
Birth Control which was published in the Woman Citizen in February 23, 1924
have some adaptability in status of family and society. At that time, Margaret
Sanger tended to represent the development of birth control movement as a
consequence of Sanger’s will as an autonomous individual independent of the
historical context in which she was situated. Sanger’s Birth Control tends to
underestimate the political struggles in which Sanger and her “Sangerist”
compatriots engaged to define their vision of contraceptive practice within
contested gender and race politics of period.
The Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control was
legalized in terms of need for society to protect maternal and infant health,
the need of families to limit their size to their incomes, and the need of
nation to control the size and ethnic character of its population. In the Case for
Birth Control, Margaret Sanger explained clearly about status of economics,
health, age and other problems if the children already born. Some people think
the Sanger’s Case for Birth Control represented a necessary part of progress;
human reproduction became one more process that required conscious
intervention. Without conscious control, hospitals, and asylums would be
crowned by the weak offspring of weakened mothers. Freedom from unending
pregnancies would enable women to bear and raise healthier children, who would
in turn, become productive to member of society; however, with the nine reasons
Sanger articulated radical maternalist logic for legalized birth control. If
ethnic mothers had birth control they could rise to the scientific standards of
motherhood and prevent disease, delinquency and dependency among their
children. For motherhood to succeed in guiding progress, she must popularize
birth control thinking, set motherhood free, and give the foreign and submerged
mother knowledge that will enable her to prevent bringing to birth children
they do not want. For example, a middle-income family (earning $44,500 to
$74,900 a year) with two children might well spend 40 to 45% or more their
after-tax income on their offspring. For a child born in 2006 of a
middle-income family with two children, the cost before age 18 could be
$197,700, and college expenses are yet to come! (Source Dye 2006), so “children
should not be born to parents whose economic circumstances do not guarantee
enough to provide the children with the necessities of life,” (reason of
seventh). Beginning in midthirties, the message of the Case for Birth Control
movement began to focus on winning state financing of contraceptive clinics. In
part this was a response to declining contributions. In part it was a response
to renewed public commitment to maternal and infant health. Sangerist organized
this effort by drawing on an extensive national network of support for the National
Committee on Federal Legislation for Birth Control (NCFL) to encourage local,
state, and country health services to request funding for contraceptive clinics
under New Deal health legislation. Sanger was same as guider for birth
including contraception and abortion, and that offers them few routes out of
poverty, and reproduction choices; the poverty rates are also much higher among
women of color, these women will bear the brunt of such coercive applications
of the economic ethic of fertility. The guiding right to life in the Case for
Birth Control however was legal. For much of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s the
movement pressured State and Federal legislatures to ensnare abortion in a
thicket of regulations and prohibitions. In 1980s, for instance, these included
a waiting period between the request for and the performance of an abortion;
birth and death certificates for fetuses providing the patient with and oral
description of the fetus and its physiological characteristics; informing the
patient that the unborn child is a human life, limiting abortions to hospitals
(thereby raising the cost); using extraordinary measures (such as compulsory
cesarean section) to allow “aborted” fetuses to survive, and requiring
permission from minors’ parents and women’s husbands. In 1990s, further state
restrictions were added: post viability abortions now required the consent of a
second physician, gestational age, weight, and lung maturity of fetuses prior
to abortion must be determined by physician; birth control clinics receiving
public funding may not inform women of their legal right to an abortion, and
detailed information about abortion providers and patients must be reported
publicly. The Margaret Sanger’s nine reasons also consider more contraception
to resolve the population; they are the best ways to concern about woman and
family status before decide yes or no. The Sanger’s apply is basic health care
and should be treated as such as a matter of public policy. The average woman
will spend five years pregnant or trying to get pregnant, and nearly three
decades trying to avoid pregnancy. Laws promoting insurance coverage for
contraception are crucial to protecting and promoting women’s health. By
guaranteeing that insurers cover prescription contraception to the same extent
as other drugs, contraceptive-equity laws help ensure women’s access to birth
control and ultimately prevent unintended pregnancies and reduce the need for
abortion. Today basing on the main reasons of the care for birth control, there
has been a modest increase in childlessness in the United States. According to
Census data, about 16 to 17 percent of women will now complete their child
bearing years without having born any children; compared to 10 percent in 1980,
as many as 20 percent of women in their 30s expect to remain childless
(Biddlecom and Martin 2006). More and more couples today, choose not to have
children and regard themselves as child-free rather than childless. They do not
believe that having children automatically follow from marriage, nor do they
feel that reproduction is duty of all married couples. Margaret Sanger’s
reasons are best advice for couples who will in the future have greater regard
for the quality of bodies and brains which must be equipped for the task of
building the future civilization. The Sanger is the cornerstone of that great
structure although it several arguments in history
No comments:
Post a Comment